Evidence: Presumptions as Evidence. A Reply

Evidence based medicine--a reply.

Access to Evidence and Presumptions – Communicating Vessels in Procedural Law

REPLY Searching for Evidence , Not a War : Reply to Lindquist ,

Lindquist, Siegel, Quigley, and Barrett (2013) critiqued our recent meta-analysis that reported the effects of discrete emotions on outcomes, including cognition, judgment, physiology, behavior, and experience (Lench, Flores, & Bench, 2011). Lindquist et al. offered 2 major criticisms—we address both and consider the nature of emotion and scientific debate. Their 1st criticism, that the meta-an...

A review on evidence-based medicine

Physicians’ daily need for valid information about diseases, their limited time for finding this information, the inadequacy of traditional sources (E.g. textbooks) to address this matter, the disparity between physicians diagnostic skills and clinical judgment (Which increase with experience) and their up to date knowledge and clinical performance (Which decline by time), as well as dramatic d...

Reply to “No evidence for iris”

A number of points put forth by Hartmann and Michelsen (2002) (henceforth HM) are, in fact, irrelevant to the iris effect (i.e., their discussion of the meteorological origin of various systems). We shall discuss this in greater detail later. Some are quantitatively insignificant (the effect of spreading cloud cover near the equator); we shall also return to this later. Others are simply wrong ...